Transparency

Methodology

How EPC2C calculates compliance pathways, cost estimates and band uplift projections. What the tool can and cannot tell you.

Data source

EPC2C uses data from the MHCLG Open Data Communities EPC Register API — the official government database of lodged Energy Performance Certificates for England and Wales. This is the same data underpinning the government’s Find an energy certificate service.

When you search a postcode, EPC2C queries this register and returns the most recent lodged EPC for each property at that postcode. The data includes:

The accuracy of this data depends on when the EPC was lodged and the assessor who conducted it. Older EPCs may not reflect the current state of the property.

Confidence levels

EPC2C uses a four-level confidence system to indicate the reliability of estimates:

Level 1
Low
EPC register data only. Band and measure data from a potentially outdated lodged EPC. Significant uncertainty on actual current state.
Level 2
Low–Medium
Free tier result. EPC data confirmed for postcode and property selected, but no measure-level analysis performed.
Level 3
Medium
Compliance Plan tier. EPC data combined with GoGreen Alliance cost rules and SAP sequential subtraction. Indicative planning estimate (±30–50%).
Level 4
High
Verified Survey tier. DEA site visit, measured dimensions from RdSAP XML. Cost estimates ±15%. New EPC lodged post-works confirms actual rating.

How band uplift is estimated

EPC band uplift projections in the Compliance Plan are based on a simplified SAP sequential subtraction methodology.

Each measure has an estimated SAP point contribution derived from:

SAP points are converted to EPC bands using the standard Government conversion table:

EPC BandSAP Score Range
G1–20
F21–38
E39–54
D55–68
C69–80
B81–91
A92+

Measures are applied sequentially: the projected SAP score is calculated by adding the uplift from each selected measure to the current SAP score. Interactions between measures (e.g. a heat pump requiring better insulation to perform optimally) are not fully modelled at Medium confidence. The Verified Survey tier accounts for these interactions.

How costs are calculated

At Medium confidence (Compliance Plan), cost ranges are derived from:

These are presented as a range (e.g. £400–£800) reflecting typical contractor variation. Actual quotes may fall outside this range depending on access, scaffolding requirements, and local market conditions.

At High confidence (Verified Survey), costs are calculated from actual measured dimensions extracted from the RdSAP XML file uploaded by the DEA after site visit. This produces GoGreen Alliance’s specific m² rate applied to the actual wall area, roof area, and floor area of the property — producing estimates typically accurate to ±15%.

GoGreen Alliance m² rates

GoGreen Alliance’s cost rates are based on real West Midlands installation pricing as of 2024–2025. They are reviewed periodically but may not reflect current market conditions in all regions of England and Wales. Properties in London, remote rural areas, or with unusual access requirements will typically see higher costs.

Why not a certified RdSAP calculation

A certified RdSAP (Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure) calculation requires a qualified DEA to:

EPC2C cannot replicate this process. The Compliance Plan uses EPC register data and cost rules to produce planning-level estimates — suitable for deciding whether to commission works, which measures to prioritise, and whether an exemption is likely. It is not suitable as evidence of compliance.

When to get a verified survey

We recommend upgrading to a Verified Compliance Survey (Tier 3) when:

Limitations

EPC2C is a planning tool. Results should be understood in the context of the following limitations:

For questions about the methodology, contact hello@epc2c.co.uk.